Faculty Ethics Committee

Faculty Ethics Committee on AI Technology

AI with Integrity:

ASU’s Design Principles for Beneficial and Responsible AI

Read our Design Principles for Beneficial and Responsible AI

Our Six Design Principles


ASU is a place of innovation, but also of inclusion. With AI advancing rapidly, we can’t afford to leave ethics behind. These principles provide a compass for daily decision-making, whether you’re building AI tools, integrating them into curricula, or evaluating their impact on students, research, and operations.

They aren’t static rules, they’re living guidelines meant to evolve alongside the technology and our collective understanding of it.

We have a responsibility to create AI experiences that open and amplify possibilities (as opposed to limiting or closing down pathways or options) in service of respecting human autonomy and empowering individuals and communities. We must always put humans first. We recognize that all data and models are incomplete and flawed, tending to create bias as they replicate formal legacy systems and ways of thinking. By amplifying possibilities we can mitigate the harm that can come from limiting options or biased pathways which can have the effect of reinforcing inequities, lead to coercion, undermining human dignity, and restrict autonomy and choice. The goal is to create AI that respects the diversity of human experiences and values and reflects the ASU charter and design aspirations, striving to ensure that AI serves to enhance the human experience rather than diminish it.

We have a responsibility to bring the best of what technology has to offer to the ASU community while being aware of potential risks, and to keep pace with the rapid progression of generative AI. This requires us to embrace experimentation and agility in the learning process, determining what works, adopting a mindset of learning fast, learning forward, and sharing knowledge.

Before release — and on an ongoing basis, we must rigorously evaluate AI tools, platforms, models, and experiences for possible impacts and potential harm. We must continually seek to improve transparency and increase observability. Our commitment extends to continuous improvement, actively working to mitigate harm, and decisively removing technologies or procedures that fall short of our ethical standards.

We design for equity. That means making sure AI doesn’t unintentionally widen existing disparities or other gaps based on demographic.  We commit to measuring impact, protecting privacy, and prioritizing access for all.

We have a responsibility to develop and deploy AI models and applications with attention to the rights of individuals’ privacy and agency in the use of their data, individually and in aggregate. We should prioritize transparency of scope, purpose, and risks inherent in disclosing data to ASU and leverage opportunities for disclosure of privacy terms to educate our stakeholders in being informed and empowered data citizens. 

Developing and using generative AI responsibly and beneficially is a shared responsibility between the enterprise and individuals. This responsibility should be iterative and reciprocal in nature. 

  • The enterprise has a responsibility to provide clear, current, concise and visible:
    • Feedback mechanisms
    • Training and education
    • Expectations for engagement with AI tools for their stated purpose
    • Disclosures including whether and when AI is in use, potential risks, responsibility and accountability
  • The individual has a responsibility to:
    • Provide timely feedback
    • Engage meaningfully with training and education
    • Read and comply with expectations for engagement
    • Read and account for disclosures, including potential risks, in active decision-making using the technology

About the Faculty Ethics Committee on AI Technology

The Faculty Ethics Committee on AI Technology supports Enterprise Technology in guiding the ethical development and responsible design of AI in an environment of constant change. This transdisciplinary group of faculty experts advises on the creation of ethical guidelines and guardrails that shape how AI is used across ASU’s technology ecosystem.

Core Responsibilities:

The committee’s primary mission is to review, advise, and influence policies and practices related to AI-enabled technologies. Their work focuses on three key goals:

  1. Shape and evolve guidelines and guardrails for the ethical development and use of AI-enabled tools.
     
  2. Review AI technology solutions, at all stages, from proposal to implementation, to ensure alignment with ethical principles and responsible design.
     
  3. Contribute to thought leadership, including white papers, presentations, and educational forums to help ASU stay at the forefront of ethical AI understanding.

Expertise and Impact

The committee brings together deep expertise in education, law, global futures, film, and business. Their collective insights allow them to assess complex issues such as bias, transparency, data privacy, accountability, and social impact.

Through close collaboration with researchers, administrators, technologists, and external experts, the committee fosters a comprehensive, university-wide approach to AI ethics.


They also play an active role in:

  • Developing educational resources
  • Leading workshops and forums
  • Promoting responsible use of AI
  • Building a culture of ethical technology at ASU

With their guidance, ASU continues to lead with integrity—ensuring our use of AI aligns with our charter, reflects our values, and serves the public good.

Meet the Committee

 

Ronald Beghetto

   Ron Beghetto

Professor, Pinnacle West Presidential Chair,
Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College

Diana Bowman

   Diana Bowman

Associate Dean for Applied Research and Partnerships, Professor of Law,
Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Andrew Maynard

   Andrew Maynard

Senior Global Futures Scholar,
Global Futures Scientists and Scholars

Gary Merchant

   Gary Merchant 

Regents and Foundation Professor of Law;
Faculty Director, Center for Law,
Science and Innovation,
Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law

Olivia Sheng

   Olivia Sheng

W. P. Carey Distinguished Chair & Professor,
W. P. Carey Information Systems

Horacio Velasquez Melo

     Horacio Velasquez Melo 

Clinical Assistant Professor,
The Sidney Poitier New American Film School